Mont Pelerin Society MPS – Social Darwinism – Free Market Economics – Atlas Koch Network

Featured

The Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) another fulcrum of influence for radical right libertarians, climate science deniers and fossil fuels, the less than 1% and Austrian-Chicago School of social-Darwinist economics, with its influence continuing via Atlas or Koch Network and ultra conservatives.

MPS has been behind and influenced a network of think tanks globally via Atlas or Koch to promote climate science denial, fossil fuels, deregulation or lower standards etc. then leveraging right wing media, influencers, advisors and politicians to adopt the same policies, see ‘bill mill’ ALEC.

Members allegedly have included Charles Koch, and supported by notables including Murdochs, Evangelical Christian and related donors, with the GOP Republicans adopting MPS and John Birch Society ideas, themes and actions for Project 2025, being developed with Heritage Foundation support.

Like members of IEA Institute of Economic Affairs and MPS, ‘segregation economist’ James Buchanan, the economic muse of Charles Koch, Atlas and Koch Network.

Objective, beyond low tax, small government and light regulation appears to be implementing a permanent social-Darwinist ideology used to justify corrupt nativist Christian authoritarianism in the Anglosphere, west, Russia and developing world, for the less than 1%?

DeSmog:

The Mont Pelerin Society MPS

Background

The Mont Pelerin Society (MPS) was created in 1947 by the free market economist and philosopher Friedrich von Hayek and advocates “classical liberalism,” an ideology classified by small government and minimal regulation of business. It was named after the location of the group’s first meeting in Switzerland, and the group’s subsequent annual meetings have spanned the globe including Galapagos Islands, Prague (former Czech president Vaclav Klaus is a member), New York, Morocco, Tokyo, Sydney, Buenos Aires, and Stockholm. American economist Milton Friedman was also one of the founding members of the Society….

….. Antony Fisher, a former Mont Pelerin Society Member, established both the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) in Europe, and the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. IEA’s other co-founder, Arthur Seldon, was formerly vice president of the MPS.

The Atlas Society, not to be confused with the Atlas Network, also includes individuals with affiliations to MPS. According to DeSmog research, Mont Pelerin members have ties to a wide range of conservative think tanks, many which have consistently denied the human influence on climate change. Some of the top groups tied to MPS through affiliations of its members include the Cato Institute, The Hoover Institution, the Heritage Foundation, the Reason Foundation, the Foundation for Economic Education, the American Enterprise Institute, the Centre for the New Europe, George Mason University, Fraser Institute, Mercatus Center (George Mason University), and the Heartland Institute.

Membership lists obtained by DeSmog dating to 2010 and, more recently, 2013 show that organizations represented by the MPS have deep ties to the Koch network. Charles Koch himself is a long-standing member of the Society. DeSmog dug into individual member affiliations, and found that Koch foundations have poured more than $100 million into at least 54 groups connected to individual MPS members.

Stance on Climate Change

Some sources have connected the proliferation of climate change denial organizations and think tanks with neoliberalism. A 2013 issue of the not-for-profit magazine Overland put it as follows:

“Neoliberalism is a coherent political movement embodied in the institutional history of the global network of think tanks: the American Enterprise Institute, the Cato Institute, the Institute of Economic Affairs, the Institute of Public Affairs (the key Australian node of the network) and their dedicated spin-off counter-science think tanks. All can be traced back to the Mont Pelerin Society, the central think tank of the neoliberal counter-revolution, founded in 1947 by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman.”

Overland also equates the tactics of climate science denialism with that of the tobacco industry.

“Each component of the neoliberal response is firmly grounded in neoliberal economic doctrine and has its own special function. Similar to the strategies of tobacco companies, science denialism is intended to quash immediate impulses to respond to the crisis, thus buying time for commercial interests to find a way to profit. The think tanks behind the denial of climate change don’t seriously believe they will, in the long run, win the war of ideas within academic science. But bashing pointy-headed elites lends them a certain populist cachet, while protecting the commercial interests of the oil companies, coal miners and gas drillers.

The project to institute markets in emission permits is a neoliberal mid-range strategy, better attuned to appeal to centrist governments, NGOs and the educated segments of the populace, as well as to the financial sector. […]”

Writing at DeSmog, Graham Readfearn has noted that the Mont Pelerin Society has long been home to some of the most ardent supporters of climate change denial……

Continues here.’

For more related blogs and articles on Australian Politics, Climate Change, Conservative, Economics, Environment, Fossil Fuel Pollution, Koch Network, Libertarian Economics, Political Strategy and Radical Right Libertarians click through:

Adam Smith – Classical Liberal Economics or Conservative Calvinist Christianity or White Christian Nationalism?

Posted on June 21, 2021

We observe many governments, especially Anglosphere and conservative, following the ideology of Adam Smith, promoted through Koch linked think tanks, assiduously. The outcomes include less Keynesian influence on government policy and more Smith, or Hayek, Friedman and Buchanan.

The latter cite ‘freedom and liberty’ for society, and economic policies based round ‘public choice theory’, monetarism and small government. Related there is also much emphasis or attention paid to elections, taxes, government budgets and many sociocultural issues including impairment of workers and unions rights, interfering on university campuses, demanding immigration restrictions, ‘freedom of speech’ and using Christianity as a divisive issue to create an ageing conservative voter coalition, especially in the USA.

CPAC Conservative Political Action Conference and the John Birch Society

Posted on March 14, 2024

CPAC US has been in the news for falling audiences and fallings out between different groups and players, while CPAC Hungary will be held 25-26th April in Budapest.

Recently both The Atlantic and SPLC Southern Poverty Law Center have highlighted the links between CPAC and the anti-communist John Birch Society, founded by Robert Welch, with assistance from others including Fred Koch.

Anglosphere Nativist Libertarian Social Economic Policies or Return of Eugenics?

Posted on October 28, 2022

In the past decade we have witnessed a political shift to the nativist and libertarian right in the Anglosphere, but described as ‘conservative’, appealing to the important above median age voter, less educated, more socially conservative, obedient and monocultural, but e.g. in UK leading to austerity measures?

Most of these ideas come from the classical or liberal economists of the past including Calvin, Smith, Ricardo et al. and also includes old eugenics based ideas of dour Christian men like Malthus on population, Galton on social Darwinism or eugenics, and worse, Madison Grant in the US who influenced Hitler.

Ghosts of Galton and Eugenics Return – Society, Population and Environment in the 21st Century

Posted on November 25, 2021

We have already looked at some other key players of the past related to eugenics, population via Malthus and liberal economics of Adam Smith, now we look at Galton, if not in detail, a broad sketch of his life and later impact on society, especially in the Anglosphere.

This has been exemplified by how eugenics theory never went away, even after the Nazis post WWII, but reemerged via the US using an environmental and climate prism, with a focus upon Malthusian population obsessions; supported by ZPG, UNPD data, Anglosphere media and think tanks to avoid regulation and business constraints, while encouraging xenophobia.

CPAC Conservative Political Action Conference and the John Birch Society

Posted on March 14, 2024

CPAC US has been in the news for falling audiences and fallings out between different groups and players, while CPAC Hungary will be held 25-26th April in Budapest.

Recently both The Atlantic and SPLC Southern Poverty Law Center have highlighted the links between CPAC and the anti-communist John Birch Society, founded by Robert Welch, with assistance from others including Fred Koch.

Anglosphere Oligarchs – Koch Atlas Network Think Tanks

Posted on March 27, 2023

We have heard much of supposed ‘libertarian’ think tanks or PR outfits in the Anglosphere influencing policy, especially of the right, via media and lobbying, euphemistically known as ‘Koch Network’ or the ‘Kochtopus’ with a fondness for fossil fuels and climate science denial.

New Yorker journalist Jane Mayer investigated several years ago for her book ‘Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right’ (2017) which included insight into oligarch donors Mellon-Scaife, Olin, Bradley, DeVos and Coors.

Further, historian Nancy MacLean in researching her book ‘Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America’ (2017) she stumbled across the economic muse of Kochs, ‘segregation economist’ James Buchanan.

Adam Smith – Classical Liberal Economics or Conservative Calvinist Christianity or White Christian Nationalism?

We observe many governments, especially Anglosphere and conservative, following the ideology of Adam Smith, promoted through Koch linked think tanks, assiduously. The outcomes include less Keynesian influence on government policy and more Smith, or Hayek, Friedman and Buchanan.

The latter cite ‘freedom and liberty’ for society, and economic policies based round ‘public choice theory’, monetarism and small government. Related there is also much emphasis or attention paid to elections, taxes, government budgets and many sociocultural issues including impairment of workers and unions rights, interfering on university campuses, demanding immigration restrictions, ‘freedom of speech’ and using Christianity as a divisive issue to create an ageing conservative voter coalition, especially in the USA.

What is Smith about and are his theories or principles valid today?

Following are a few summaries from selected sources to compare common points which include deep seated Christianity e.g. ‘balance’ or the ‘invisible hand’ based on belief or the ‘laws of nature’, ‘natural liberty’, self interest, small state and government, low taxes and class system, but seems less fit for the present and future. Coincidentally with Covid conservative governments have returned to Keynesian spending to support economies as Smith’s ‘classical liberalism’ is not fit for purpose in a modern democracy.

From Investopedia – Sharma

Smith’s Wealth of Nations of 1776 promoted the idea of ‘balance’ in the economy e.g. ‘steady-state theory’, due to self interest or the ‘invisible hand’ of the markets except for when the state is essential on borders, law and public works.

He goes further to then link the ‘invisible hand’ with free markets and free will of people for prosperity, which also justifies no state regulatory constraints, except for some govt. intervention on shortages or surpluses.

Smith’s ‘elements of prosperity’ has at its centre self interest, small government and currency with a free market, but lacks evidence, while it seems to justify the existence of elites whether landed, industrial, Christian or otherwise, especially wealthy.

From The Secret, Natural Theological Foundation of Adam Smith’s Work – Journal of Markets & Morality – Alvey

Smith’s ‘Wealth of Nations’ is based on the unsupported principle or phenomenon of balance seemingly from God. His use of teleological views came from apportioning, through guess work, that outcomes were divine inspiration, ‘laws of nature’ or attributable to God. Smith also cited three essential elements of ‘order’ i.e. class system, external and internal security; backgrounded by human instinct which can be helpful, or not.

Smith’s understanding of nature, moral philosophy and political economy were couched in theological framework, covertly, while not being totally positive about humanity and its future. 

From 240 years of The Wealth of Nations – 240 anos de A Riqueza das Nações – Maria Pia Paganelli

Wealth of Nation is dated and has been superseded by significant events of change whether economic, political or social.

A 18th C economy does not compare with a 21st C economy, nor do we have aristocracy but democracy with state health and social security systems vs. basic subsistence charity for the poor, forced into labour.

Smith had been accused of not being libertarian nor pro-capitalism enough by modern day economic ideologues.

WofN has been compared with the Bible where it can be used for relevant inspiration but not literal truth. Along with James Buchanan, Smith seemed to believe in ‘natural liberty’ and its ‘efficiency’ along with economic theory; focus on efficiency but is it effective?

WofN had no new ideas, unsupported theories and hypotheses masquerading as grounded science; many others have also criticised his work as mixed up, misguided, confused, crude and biased.

On the hand many protagonists of Smith or libertarian economics complain that he gives encouragement to anti-capitalists, while Buchanan claims he was sensibly not an anarchist like the latter.

From Does classical liberalism imply democracy? David Ellerman*

Democratic and non-democratic forms are promoted in the US, with James Buchanan as a ‘representative of the democratic strain of classical liberalism’

According to Buchanan, social or societal structures are important for people to choose their participation to representatives of their authority and that government is based upon agreement or consent.

References:

Alvey J. 2004 ‘The Secret, Natural Theological Foundation of Adam Smith’s Work’, Journal of Markets & Morality, Volume 7, Number 2 (Fall 2004): 335–361

Blenman J. 2020 ‘Adam Smith and the Wealth of Nations’ Investopedia, Retrieved https://www.investopedia.com/updates/adam-smith-wealth-of-nations/ (6 March 2021).

Ellerman D. 2015 ‘Does classical liberalism imply democracy?’, Ethics & Global Politics, 8:1, 29310, DOI: 10.3402/egp.v8.29310

Paganelli M. 2017 ‘240 years of The Wealth of Nations – 240 anos de A Riqueza das Nações’ Nova Economia https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/3743

This blog will continue in future with related updates and additions. For more related blogs and articles on Conservative, Economics, Global Trade, Government Budgets, Libertarian Economics, Political Strategy and Populist Politics click through.